Inupiat vs Chickasaw Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Inupiat
Chickasaw
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Inupiat
Chickasaw
16.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Chickasaw Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,337,062 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.118 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,689,565 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 9.6%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Inupiat | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 5.4% | 5.7% |
| Maximum | 26.9% | 42.5% |
| Range | 21.6% | 36.8% |
| Mean | 15.2% | 18.7% |
| Median | 14.5% | 18.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.8% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.1% | 20.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 4.9% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Inupiat by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from Japan (16.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Denmark (16.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (16.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Korean (16.8%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Albanians | 97.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Arapaho | 97.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.2 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.1 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Yup'ik | 96.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Inupiat | 96.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 96.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 96.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| South Africans | 95.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Scottish | 95.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 94.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Portuguese | 94.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Subsaharan African (18.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Hmong (18.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Choctaw (18.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.6% |