Inupiat vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Inupiat
Chickasaw
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Inupiat
Chickasaw
80.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
80.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,340,693 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.171 and weighted average of 80.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,707,163 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.100 and weighted average of 80.9%, a difference of 0.050%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Inupiat | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 48.1% | 39.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 51.9% | 61.0% |
Mean | 79.3% | 77.5% |
Median | 81.1% | 78.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 70.8% | 73.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 85.5% | 82.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.7% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.0% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.9% | 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Inupiat and Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Puerto Rican (80.7%, a difference of 0.33%), Paiute (80.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Alaskan Athabascan (81.3%, a difference of 0.44%), Yaqui (80.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and Choctaw (80.5%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Puerto Rican (80.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Paiute (80.6%, a difference of 0.35%), Yaqui (80.5%, a difference of 0.46%), Choctaw (80.5%, a difference of 0.47%), and Alaskan Athabascan (81.3%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 82.0% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 81.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 81.7% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 81.6% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 81.6% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.5% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 80.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 80.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 80.7% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 80.6% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 80.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 80.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 80.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.0% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 79.7% |