Chinese vs South American Indian Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
South American Indian
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Chinese
South American Indians
15.4%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
96.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs South American Indian Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,120,579 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,417,675 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.272 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 2.0%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | South American Indian |
Minimum | 0.92% | 8.2% |
Maximum | 85.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 84.1% | 91.8% |
Mean | 19.0% | 25.0% |
Median | 14.7% | 15.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.5% | 25.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.0% | 22.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.8% | 22.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and South American Indians by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Oceania (15.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Russia (15.5%, a difference of 0.38%), Brazilian (15.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and Burmese (15.5%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Chilean (15.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Fijian (15.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Chile (15.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (15.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and Zimbabwean (15.6%, a difference of 0.83%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Peruvians | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Brazilians | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Burmese | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Mexican American Indians | 98.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.6 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.5 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Basques | 98.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 98.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 15.6% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 15.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 15.6% |
Yaqui | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 15.6% |
Zimbabweans | 98.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 15.6% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 97.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.6% |
Immigrants | Chile | 96.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Fijians | 96.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Chileans | 96.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.7% |
South American Indians | 96.2 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.7% |