Iroquois vs Cuban Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 188,628,769 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.055. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Cubans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 16.4 Cubans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $49,152, a difference of 9.3%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $50,655, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $86,301, a difference of 1.1%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $73,392, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $81,483, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.1%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 34.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.81%), female poverty (15.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and poverty (14.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 27.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 27.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 25.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 12.8%), family households (62.2% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 8.8%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 0.16%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 28.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.74%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 33.6%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 16.0%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 43.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 38.5%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.3%).