Burmese vs Immigrants from Saudi Arabia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 161,427,114 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Saudi Arabia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 0.3 Immigrants from Saudi Arabia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $95,450, a difference of 19.1%), median household income ($103,145 compared to $86,875, a difference of 18.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $46,187, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.8%), householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $63,355, a difference of 12.3%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $39,952, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 33.7%), male poverty (9.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 30.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (49.8% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 12.2%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.5%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 14.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.61%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 5.3%), bachelor's degree (46.9% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and associate's degree (54.6% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.6% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 16.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.0%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.74%), ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.3%).