Burmese vs Latvian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Burmese
Latvian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Burmese
Latvians
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Latvian Integration in Burmese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,554,811 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Latvians.
Burmese vs Latvian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($103,145 compared to $97,311, a difference of 6.0%), householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $67,326, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $115,957, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.51%), per capita income ($52,005 compared to $52,649, a difference of 1.2%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $43,941, a difference of 2.2%).
Income Metric | Burmese | Latvian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,005 | Exceptional $52,649 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $123,369 | Exceptional $120,301 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $103,145 | Exceptional $97,311 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $54,559 | Exceptional $53,001 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $65,236 | Exceptional $63,498 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $44,911 | Exceptional $43,941 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,800 | Excellent $52,783 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $113,701 | Exceptional $108,926 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $121,444 | Exceptional $115,957 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $71,139 | Exceptional $67,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Tragic 27.9% |
Burmese vs Latvian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 10.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and single male poverty (11.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.2%), poverty (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Poverty Metric | Burmese | Latvian |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.9% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.0% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.0% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.7% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.3% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.5% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.2% | Exceptional 26.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Burmese vs Latvian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.1%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.43%).
Unemployment Metric | Burmese | Latvian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.3% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Burmese vs Latvian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.80%).
Labor Participation Metric | Burmese | Latvian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.5% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.6% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.3% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Burmese vs Latvian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.3%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.060%), currently married (48.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.98%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Burmese | Latvian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.8% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.22 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.9% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.4% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Burmese vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.10%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Burmese | Latvian |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.6% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Fair 6.1% |
Burmese vs Latvian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.4%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and bachelor's degree (46.9% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (71.9% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 0.40%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.44%).
Education Level Metric | Burmese | Latvian |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Excellent 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Excellent 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Excellent 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.8% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.3% | Exceptional 89.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.9% | Exceptional 71.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.7% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 54.6% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.9% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.7% | Exceptional 19.8% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Burmese vs Latvian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.9%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.16%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Disability Metric | Burmese | Latvian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.4% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.6% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.9% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |