Burmese vs European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 460,992,062 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Europeans within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.227. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 22.8 Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and European communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($103,145 compared to $88,751, a difference of 16.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $98,310, a difference of 15.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $106,367, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 4.9%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $51,796, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $63,779, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and European communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 20.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 18.1%), and single female poverty (18.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.3%), poverty (10.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 18.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and European communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 14.7%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.8% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 0.50%), currently married (48.9% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 0.81%), and family households (65.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 36.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and European communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 31.9%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.3%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.3% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.43%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and European communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 26.9%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.1%).