Pima vs Chickasaw Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Pima
Chickasaw
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Pima
Chickasaw
14.8%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.0%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Chickasaw Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,926,282 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,493,414 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380 and weighted average of 19.0%, a difference of 28.4%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 5.6% | 10.0% |
| Maximum | 57.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 51.6% | 90.0% |
| Mean | 23.0% | 31.9% |
| Median | 20.0% | 25.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.9% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.7% | 37.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.9% | 18.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.4% | 19.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.9% | 19.3% |
Similar Demographics by Single Father Poverty
Demographics Similar to Pima by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Indian (Asian) (14.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nepal (14.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Asia (14.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Eritrea (14.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Bolivian (14.7%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Egyptians | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Pima | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Delaware (18.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Potawatomi (18.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Osage (19.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Nonimmigrants (18.8%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 19.8% |