Pima vs Chickasaw Unemployment Among Ages 55 to 59 years
COMPARE
Pima
Chickasaw
Unemployment Among Ages 55 to 59 years
Unemployment Among Ages 55 to 59 years Comparison
Pima
Chickasaw
6.6%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 55 TO 59 YEARS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 55 TO 59 YEARS
65.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Chickasaw Unemployment Among Ages 55 to 59 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,402,729 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and unemployment rate among population between the ages 55 and 59 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.679 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,352,588 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among population between the ages 55 and 59 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 38.3%.
Unemployment Among Ages 55 to 59 years Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 3.5% | 0.90% |
| Maximum | 19.2% | 42.9% |
| Range | 15.7% | 42.0% |
| Mean | 9.1% | 10.2% |
| Median | 6.7% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.2% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 10.3% |
Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Ages 55 to 59 years
Demographics Similar to Pima by Unemployment Among Ages 55 to 59 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Pueblo (6.7%, a difference of 1.2%), Colville (6.7%, a difference of 1.4%), Navajo (6.7%, a difference of 1.6%), Paiute (6.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and Aleut (6.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 55 to 59 years |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Unemployment Among Ages 55 to 59 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Nicaragua (4.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Slovak (4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Korean (4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Carpatho Rusyn (4.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Africa (4.8%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 55 to 59 years |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 67.2 /100 | #153 | Good 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 66.8 /100 | #154 | Good 4.8% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 66.3 /100 | #155 | Good 4.8% |
| Italians | 66.2 /100 | #156 | Good 4.8% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 66.0 /100 | #157 | Good 4.8% |
| Slovaks | 65.3 /100 | #158 | Good 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 65.2 /100 | #159 | Good 4.8% |
| Chickasaw | 65.1 /100 | #160 | Good 4.8% |
| Koreans | 64.6 /100 | #161 | Good 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 64.2 /100 | #162 | Good 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 63.8 /100 | #163 | Good 4.8% |
| Americans | 63.3 /100 | #164 | Good 4.8% |
| Immigrants | France | 62.0 /100 | #165 | Good 4.8% |
| Potawatomi | 62.0 /100 | #166 | Good 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 60.4 /100 | #167 | Good 4.8% |