Pima vs Chickasaw Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years

On this page

Metric Comparison Correlation Chart Correlation Data Summary Similar Demographics Pima Chickasaw

COMPARE

Pima

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German PeruvianPimaPolish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Nonimmigrants Immigrants Afghanistan Africa Albania Argentina Armenia Asia Australia Austria Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Burma/Myanmar Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Caribbean Central America Chile China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Czechoslovakia Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Eastern Africa Eastern Asia Eastern Europe Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Eritrea Ethiopia Europe Fiji France Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Korea Kuwait Laos Latin America Latvia Lebanon Liberia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico Micronesia Middle Africa Moldova Morocco Nepal Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria North America North Macedonia Northern Africa Northern Europe Norway Oceania Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Somalia South Africa South America South Central Asia South Eastern Asia Southern Europe Spain Sri Lanka St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Uganda Ukraine Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Indies Western Africa Western Asia Western Europe Yemen Zaire Zimbabwe Azores

Chickasaw

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee CheyenneChickasawChilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years

Social Comparison

Income

Per Capita Income Median Family Income Median Household Income Median Earnings Median Male Earnings Median Female Earnings Householder Income Under 25 years Householder Income Ages 25 - 44 years Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Householder Income Over 65 years Wage/Income Gap

Poverty

Poverty Family Poverty Male Poverty Female Poverty Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Single Male Poverty Single Female Poverty Single Father Poverty Single Mother Poverty Married-Couple Family Poverty Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Receiving Food Stamps

Unemployment

Labor Participation

Family Structure

Family Households Family Households with Children Married-couple Households Average Family Size Single Father Households Single Mother Households Currently Married Divorced or Separated Births to Unmarried Women

Vehicle Availability

No Vehicles in Household 1 or more Vehicles in Household 2 or more Vehicles in Household 3 or more Vehicles in Household 4 or more Vehicles in Household

Education Level

No Schooling Completed Nursery School Kindergarten 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade, No Diploma High School Diploma GED/Equivalency College, Under 1 year College, 1 year or more Associate's Degree Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Professional Degree Doctorate Degree

Disability

Disability Male Disability Female Disability Disability Age Under 5 Disability Age 5 to 17 Disability Age 18 to 34 Disability Age 35 to 64 Disability Age 65 to 74 Disability Age Over 75 Vision Disability Hearing Disability Cognitive Disability Ambulatory Disability Self-Care Disability

Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Comparison

Pima

Chickasaw

Tragic

Exceptional

6.6%

UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS

0.0/ 100

METRIC RATING

340th/ 347

METRIC RANK

4.7%

UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS

100.0/ 100

METRIC RATING

9th/ 347

METRIC RANK

Pima vs Chickasaw Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Chart

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,618,910 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,812,598 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244 and weighted average of 4.7%, a difference of 40.3%.

Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Pima	Chickasaw
Minimum	0.98%	0.98%
Maximum	58.3%	36.2%
Range	57.3%	35.2%
Mean	18.6%	9.5%
Median	10.6%	6.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.9%	3.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	32.2%	11.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	27.3%	7.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	19.8%	9.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	18.7%	9.0%

Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years

Demographics Similar to Pima by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yakama (6.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Tlingit-Haida (6.5%, a difference of 1.2%), Ute (6.5%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Armenia (6.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and Alaska Native (6.8%, a difference of 3.2%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Paiute	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 6.3%
Taiwanese	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 6.3%
Puerto Ricans	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 6.4%
Immigrants \| Armenia	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 6.5%
Ute	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 6.5%
Tlingit-Haida	0.0 /100 \| #338	Tragic 6.5%
Yakama	0.0 /100 \| #339	Tragic 6.6%
Pima	0.0 /100 \| #340	Tragic 6.6%
Alaska Natives	0.0 /100 \| #341	Tragic 6.8%
Navajo	0.0 /100 \| #342	Tragic 6.9%
Alaskan Athabascans	0.0 /100 \| #343	Tragic 7.4%
Inupiat	0.0 /100 \| #344	Tragic 7.5%
Immigrants \| Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #345	Tragic 8.3%
Yup'ik	0.0 /100 \| #346	Tragic 9.5%
Crow	0.0 /100 \| #347	Tragic 17.4%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Osage (4.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Comanche (4.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Indonesian (4.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Congo (4.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and Tongan (4.7%, a difference of 0.68%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Chinese	100.0 /100 \| #2	Exceptional 4.4%
Fijians	100.0 /100 \| #3	Exceptional 4.5%
Tsimshian	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 4.6%
Sudanese	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 4.6%
Immigrants \| Cuba	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 4.6%
Indonesians	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 4.7%
Comanche	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 4.7%
Chickasaw	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 4.7%
Osage	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Congo	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 4.7%
Tongans	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 4.7%
Lumbee	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 4.8%
Cubans	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 4.8%