Palestinian vs Sri Lankan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Palestinian
Sri Lankan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Palestinians
Sri Lankans
8.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
91.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Sri Lankan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,211,799 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 8.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 439,246,520 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 1.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Palestinian | Sri Lankan |
Minimum | 0.67% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 21.0% | 45.5% |
Range | 20.3% | 43.2% |
Mean | 8.5% | 10.8% |
Median | 7.9% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 11.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Sri Lankans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Paraguayan (8.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Native Hawaiian (8.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Soviet Union (8.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Pakistani (8.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Egypt (8.3%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Chilean (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Brazil (8.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (8.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |