Palestinian vs Armenian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Palestinian
Armenian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Palestinians
Armenians
8.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
91.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Armenian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,211,799 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 8.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,074,733 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 2.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Palestinian | Armenian |
Minimum | 0.67% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 21.0% | 22.0% |
Range | 20.3% | 19.0% |
Mean | 8.5% | 8.2% |
Median | 7.9% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 10.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Armenians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Paraguayan (8.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Native Hawaiian (8.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Soviet Union (8.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Pakistani (8.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Egypt (8.3%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Nepal (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (8.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (8.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Brazil (8.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (8.5%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |