Palestinian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Poverty
COMPARE
Palestinian
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Palestinians
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
8.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
91.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,211,799 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 8.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,739,253 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 1.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Palestinian | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 0.67% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 21.0% | 15.6% |
Range | 20.3% | 13.8% |
Mean | 8.5% | 7.1% |
Median | 7.9% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 8.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Paraguayan (8.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Native Hawaiian (8.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Soviet Union (8.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Pakistani (8.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Egypt (8.3%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Canadian (8.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from France (8.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Israel (8.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Taiwanese (8.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and South African (8.2%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Taiwanese | 94.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | France | 94.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Canadians | 94.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 93.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 8.2% |
South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Russia | 93.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |