Immigrants from Israel vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Chinese
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
93.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,738,348 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 26.4%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.67% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 38.6% | 19.1% |
Range | 37.9% | 17.8% |
Mean | 7.8% | 6.8% |
Median | 6.5% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 9.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are South African (8.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Russia (8.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Western Europe (8.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (8.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and French (8.3%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Taiwanese | 94.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | France | 94.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Canadians | 94.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 93.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 8.2% |
South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Russia | 93.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |