Immigrants from Israel vs Sri Lankan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Sri Lankan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Sri Lankans
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
93.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Sri Lankan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,738,348 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 439,246,520 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 2.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Sri Lankan |
Minimum | 0.67% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 38.6% | 45.5% |
Range | 37.9% | 43.2% |
Mean | 7.8% | 10.8% |
Median | 6.5% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 11.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel and Sri Lankans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are South African (8.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Russia (8.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Western Europe (8.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (8.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and French (8.3%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Chilean (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.50%), Puget Sound Salish (8.4%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (8.4%, a difference of 0.66%), and Portuguese (8.4%, a difference of 0.84%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 93.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 8.2% |
South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Russia | 93.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |