Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Chinese
7.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,580,330 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.184 and weighted average of 7.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 17.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sri Lanka | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.89% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 17.7% | 19.1% |
Range | 16.8% | 17.8% |
Mean | 6.6% | 6.8% |
Median | 6.1% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 9.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (7.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Tongan (7.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Okinawan (7.7%, a difference of 0.040%), German (7.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (7.7%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Scandinavians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Germans | 99.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Okinawans | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Tongans | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 98.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Swiss | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |