Yup'ik vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Yup'ik
Chinese
18.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,939,403 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.639 and weighted average of 18.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 187.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yup'ik | Chinese |
| Minimum | 3.7% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 49.0% | 19.1% |
| Range | 45.2% | 17.8% |
| Mean | 20.8% | 6.8% |
| Median | 19.1% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.5% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.6% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.6% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Navajo (18.8%, a difference of 0.55%), Pima (18.4%, a difference of 1.8%), Immigrants from Yemen (17.5%, a difference of 7.1%), Puerto Rican (20.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and Tohono O'odham (20.4%, a difference of 9.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 20.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 20.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |