Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
93.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,738,348 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,739,253 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 0.34%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 0.67% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 38.6% | 15.6% |
Range | 37.9% | 13.8% |
Mean | 7.8% | 7.1% |
Median | 6.5% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 8.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are South African (8.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Russia (8.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Western Europe (8.2%, a difference of 0.32%), French (8.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and Canadian (8.2%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Canadian (8.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from France (8.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Taiwanese (8.2%, a difference of 0.37%), South African (8.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and Romanian (8.2%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Taiwanese | 94.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | France | 94.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Canadians | 94.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 93.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 8.2% |
South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Russia | 93.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |