Swiss vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Swiss
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Swiss
Chinese
7.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,917,875 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.460 and weighted average of 7.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 18.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swiss | Chinese |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 52.4% | 19.1% |
| Range | 50.3% | 17.8% |
| Mean | 8.6% | 6.8% |
| Median | 6.9% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Swiss by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Immigrants from Sweden (7.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (7.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Indian (Asian) (7.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Serbia (7.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and Asian (7.7%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Tongans | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 98.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Indians (Asian) | 98.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Swiss | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 98.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Asians | 98.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Finns | 98.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Europeans | 98.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |