Immigrants vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants
Chinese
10.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 572,663,107 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 53.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants | Chinese |
| Minimum | 5.5% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 61.7% | 19.1% |
| Range | 56.2% | 17.8% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 6.8% |
| Median | 10.2% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Marshallese (9.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Ottawa (10.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Sudanese (10.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.0%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |