Alaska Native vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Alaska Native
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Alaska Natives
Chinese
10.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaska Native vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,710,212 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.649 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 59.4%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaska Native | Chinese |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 19.1% |
| Range | 98.7% | 17.8% |
| Mean | 21.3% | 6.8% |
| Median | 11.6% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.2% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.0% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.8% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.6% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Alaska Natives by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaska Natives are Nepalese (10.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Ghanaian (10.3%, a difference of 0.86%), Cree (10.5%, a difference of 0.94%), Immigrants from the Azores (10.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and Potawatomi (10.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
| French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |