Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bahamas
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bahamas
Chinese
11.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,583,559 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 71.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bahamas | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.5% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 26.2% | 19.1% |
Range | 24.7% | 17.8% |
Mean | 12.3% | 6.8% |
Median | 11.4% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 9.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bahamas by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Immigrants from Jamaica (11.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Somali (11.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and Spanish American (11.2%, a difference of 0.70%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 11.2% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 11.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 11.2% |
Chippewa | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 11.2% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |