Immigrants from Italy vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Italy
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Italy
Chinese
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Italy vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,411,315 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 22.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Italy | Chinese |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 22.9% | 19.1% |
Range | 20.5% | 17.8% |
Mean | 9.2% | 6.8% |
Median | 7.5% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 9.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Italy by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Immigrants from Denmark (8.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from England (8.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Czechoslovakian (8.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Serbian (8.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and Belgian (8.0%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
British | 97.5 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |