Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from Philippines Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Immigrants from Philippines
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Immigrants from Philippines
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
93.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from Philippines Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,738,348 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,729,486 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.163 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 2.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Immigrants from Philippines |
Minimum | 0.67% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 38.6% | 24.5% |
Range | 37.9% | 23.5% |
Mean | 7.8% | 7.7% |
Median | 6.5% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 8.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Philippines by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (8.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Canadian (8.2%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from France (8.2%, a difference of 0.61%), Taiwanese (8.2%, a difference of 0.72%), and Romanian (8.2%, a difference of 0.77%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Immigrants from Turkey (8.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Switzerland (8.1%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from South Africa (8.1%, a difference of 0.64%), Welsh (8.1%, a difference of 0.71%), and New Zealander (8.1%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Taiwanese | 94.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | France | 94.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Canadians | 94.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 93.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 8.2% |