Blackfeet vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Blackfeet
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Blackfeet
Chinese
11.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
279th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Blackfeet vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,172,576 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.532 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 73.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Blackfeet | Chinese |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 56.9% | 19.1% |
| Range | 54.9% | 17.8% |
| Mean | 21.4% | 6.8% |
| Median | 15.8% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.9% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.8% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.0% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.9% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Belizean (11.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Guyanese (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Chippewa (11.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Guyana (11.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Central American (11.2%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |