Immigrants from South Africa vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Chinese
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,909,353 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.647 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 24.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.3% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 30.8% | 19.1% |
Range | 29.4% | 17.8% |
Mean | 8.3% | 6.8% |
Median | 6.4% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 9.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Welsh (8.1%, a difference of 0.070%), New Zealander (8.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Norway (8.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (8.1%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |