Chinese vs Subsaharan African Family Households
COMPARE
Chinese
Subsaharan African
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Chinese
Sub-Saharan Africans
68.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Subsaharan African Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145 and weighted average of 68.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,715 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 62.1%, a difference of 9.8%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 47.5% | 32.6% |
Maximum | 82.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 35.1% | 67.4% |
Mean | 68.6% | 62.5% |
Median | 69.4% | 61.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.6% | 58.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.5% | 68.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 12.4% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Vietnam (68.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (68.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Pueblo (68.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cuba (68.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (68.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 68.3% |
Immigrants | Central America | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 68.3% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 68.3% |
Pueblo | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 68.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 68.0% |
Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 67.9% |
Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 67.8% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Sri Lankans | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 67.5% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |