Chinese vs Chickasaw 2 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Chinese
Chickasaw
2 or more Vehicles in Household
2 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Chinese
Chickasaw
60.1%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
59.0%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Chickasaw 2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 60.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,673,541 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.339 and weighted average of 59.0%, a difference of 1.9%.
2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 31.5% | 28.3% |
| Maximum | 80.6% | 84.2% |
| Range | 49.2% | 56.0% |
| Mean | 62.8% | 61.9% |
| Median | 65.3% | 63.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 59.5% | 56.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.6% | 68.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.1% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Chickasaw by 2 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Irish (60.1%, a difference of 0.030%), American (60.0%, a difference of 0.10%), British (60.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Cherokee (59.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and Northern European (59.9%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Luxembourger (59.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (59.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Celtic (59.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Spaniard (59.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Laos (59.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2 or more Vehicles in Household |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 60.1% |
| Irish | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 60.1% |
| Americans | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 60.0% |
| British | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 60.0% |
| Cherokee | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 59.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 59.9% |
| Malaysians | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 59.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 59.8% |
| French | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 59.8% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 59.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 59.6% |
| Yaqui | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 59.3% |
| Immigrants | India | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 59.3% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 59.3% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 59.3% |
| Spaniards | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 59.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 59.2% |
| Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 59.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 59.1% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 59.1% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 59.0% |