Immigrants from Italy vs New Zealander Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Italy
New Zealander
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Italy
New Zealanders
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Italy vs New Zealander Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,411,315 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,830,262 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 8.1%, a difference of 1.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Italy | New Zealander |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 22.9% | 19.9% |
Range | 20.5% | 18.8% |
Mean | 9.2% | 7.4% |
Median | 7.5% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 9.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Italy and New Zealanders by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Immigrants from Denmark (8.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from England (8.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Czechoslovakian (8.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Serbian (8.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and Belgian (8.0%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Norway (8.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Welsh (8.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (8.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Africa (8.1%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |