Immigrants from Italy vs Immigrants from China Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Italy
Immigrants from China
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Italy
Immigrants from China
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Italy vs Immigrants from China Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,411,315 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,907,220 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.451 and weighted average of 7.8%, a difference of 1.8%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Italy | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 22.9% | 22.2% |
Range | 20.5% | 21.2% |
Mean | 9.2% | 7.5% |
Median | 7.5% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 8.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from China by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Immigrants from Denmark (8.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from England (8.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Czechoslovakian (8.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Serbian (8.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and Belgian (8.0%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Austrian (7.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Romania (7.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Croatia (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Latvia (7.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and Ukrainian (7.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Austrians | 98.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | China | 98.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 98.0 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 7.9% |
English | 97.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Irish | 97.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 7.9% |
British | 97.5 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |