Uruguayan vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Uruguayans
Chickasaw
16.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
54.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,396,450 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,366,373 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 20.8%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Uruguayan | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 3.3% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 53.4% | 68.8% |
Range | 50.1% | 63.7% |
Mean | 18.4% | 24.3% |
Median | 14.2% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 18.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.4% | 27.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.6% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.3% | 10.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from Colombia (16.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Hungarian (16.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Afghan (16.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and South American (16.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Colombians | 67.6 /100 | #162 | Good 15.8% |
Yugoslavians | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #164 | Good 15.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 66.4 /100 | #165 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 65.4 /100 | #166 | Good 15.9% |
Costa Ricans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 16.0% |
South Americans | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 16.0% |
Uruguayans | 54.7 /100 | #169 | Average 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 16.1% |
Hungarians | 52.5 /100 | #171 | Average 16.2% |
Afghans | 52.3 /100 | #172 | Average 16.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 52.1 /100 | #173 | Average 16.2% |
Whites/Caucasians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.2% |
Scotch-Irish | 47.1 /100 | #175 | Average 16.3% |
Lebanese | 45.9 /100 | #176 | Average 16.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Liberian (19.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ecuador (19.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Vietnamese (19.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Cherokee (19.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Guyana (19.4%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.2% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.4% |
Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.5% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.5% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |