Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Chickasaw
21.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
35.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
190th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,955,182 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 21.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 23.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 8.8% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 62.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 53.9% | 88.9% |
Mean | 20.6% | 35.8% |
Median | 19.2% | 30.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.7% | 24.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.2% | 42.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Immigrants from Cuba (21.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Yugoslavian (21.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nigeria (21.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Hawaiian (21.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |