Spanish American Indian vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Spanish American Indians
Chickasaw
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,136,112 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 3.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American Indian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 7.6% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 48.9% | 38.6% |
Range | 41.2% | 36.7% |
Mean | 16.8% | 18.1% |
Median | 15.0% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |