South American Indian vs Chickasaw Male Unemployment
COMPARE
South American Indian
Chickasaw
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
South American Indians
Chickasaw
5.5%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
7.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
82.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Chickasaw Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,403,972 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.687 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,341,260 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 6.1%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American Indian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.9% | 0.90% |
Maximum | 34.9% | 13.2% |
Range | 32.0% | 12.3% |
Mean | 7.5% | 6.3% |
Median | 5.6% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 8.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Male Unemployment
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Israeli (5.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Hmong (5.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Lebanon (5.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and Ugandan (5.5%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 5.4% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 12.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 11.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 9.9 /100 | #206 | Tragic 5.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 9.3 /100 | #207 | Tragic 5.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 8.6 /100 | #208 | Tragic 5.5% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 8.3 /100 | #209 | Tragic 5.5% |
South American Indians | 7.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 5.5% |
Israelis | 7.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 5.5% |
Hmong | 7.0 /100 | #212 | Tragic 5.5% |
Ugandans | 6.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 5.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 5.6 /100 | #214 | Tragic 5.5% |
Samoans | 4.9 /100 | #215 | Tragic 5.5% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 5.5% |
Delaware | 4.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Germany (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Colombian (5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Western Europe (5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Pakistani (5.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 87.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 86.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 5.2% |
Hungarians | 85.1 /100 | #128 | Excellent 5.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.2% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 83.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.2% |
Chickasaw | 82.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.2% |
Colombians | 81.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.2% |
Pakistanis | 80.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 80.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.2% |
Lebanese | 79.9 /100 | #136 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 79.8 /100 | #137 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 79.7 /100 | #138 | Good 5.2% |
Kenyans | 79.4 /100 | #139 | Good 5.2% |