Ottawa vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Ottawa
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Ottawa
Chickasaw
19.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ottawa vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,714,849 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 19.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 1.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ottawa | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 6.1% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 46.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 40.9% | 96.2% |
Mean | 20.4% | 26.8% |
Median | 19.1% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.7% | 17.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.6% | 31.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Ottawa and Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Salvadoran (19.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Guyanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (19.3%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Ecuador (19.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (19.3%, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Cape Verdeans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |