Nigerian vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Nigerian
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Nigerians
Chickasaw
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nigerian vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 329,481,390 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Nigerians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.364 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,816,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 7.1%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nigerian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.7% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 50.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 48.9% | 96.7% |
Mean | 19.9% | 27.0% |
Median | 18.6% | 23.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.2% | 18.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.6% | 30.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 11.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Nigerians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Nigerians are Immigrants from Nigeria (18.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Marshallese (18.4%, a difference of 0.44%), American (18.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.59%), and Nicaraguan (18.4%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Bermudans | 2.5 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.2 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 1.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.3% |
Fijians | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.3% |
Nicaraguans | 1.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.4% |
Marshallese | 1.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.2 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.4% |
Nigerians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.5% |
Americans | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 0.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.6 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.6 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Belizean (19.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Cherokee (19.7%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and Jamaican (20.0%, a difference of 0.74%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.6% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |
Belizeans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 19.9% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.0% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.0% |