Immigrants from South America vs Malaysian Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from South America
Malaysian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from South America
Malaysians
65.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
77th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South America vs Malaysian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,016,991 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 65.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,012,303 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.36%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South America | Malaysian |
| Minimum | 41.2% | 27.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 93.6% |
| Range | 58.8% | 65.8% |
| Mean | 68.4% | 66.8% |
| Median | 67.1% | 65.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.0% | 62.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.9% | 71.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 10.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 10.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South America and Malaysians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South America are Yaqui (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from the Azores (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Puget Sound Salish (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Houma (65.7%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 65.5% |