Immigrants from Indonesia vs Portuguese Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Indonesia
Portuguese
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Indonesia
Portuguese
66.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Indonesia vs Portuguese Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,720,751 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.052 and weighted average of 66.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,986,685 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of 65.8%, a difference of 0.24%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Indonesia | Portuguese |
| Minimum | 42.7% | 36.8% |
| Maximum | 85.4% | 100.0% |
| Range | 42.7% | 63.2% |
| Mean | 69.1% | 68.0% |
| Median | 69.3% | 66.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.4% | 63.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 76.3% | 71.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.9% | 8.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Indonesia and Portuguese by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Indonesia are Central American (66.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Pima (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Danish (66.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and South American (66.0%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Laotian (65.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |