Immigrants from Lebanon vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lebanon
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Lebanon
Chickasaw
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
71.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lebanon vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,145,766 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 52.8%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lebanon | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.4% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 8.7% | 21.2% |
Range | 7.3% | 18.8% |
Mean | 3.6% | 7.4% |
Median | 3.0% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.9% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lebanon by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lebanon are Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Poland (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |