Immigrants from Egypt vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Egypt
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Egypt
Chickasaw
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Egypt vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,432,770 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 65.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Egypt | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.86% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 6.1% | 21.2% |
Range | 5.3% | 18.8% |
Mean | 2.9% | 7.4% |
Median | 2.8% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.2% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Egypt by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Egypt are Immigrants from Eritrea (2.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (2.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Colombia (2.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Peru (2.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and Indian (Asian) (2.7%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Ethiopians | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 98.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.4 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Belize | 98.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Egyptians | 98.1 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |