British vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
British
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
British
Chickasaw
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,095,023 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.669 and weighted average of 3.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 28.8%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | British | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 98.2% | 21.2% |
| Range | 96.4% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 8.9% | 7.4% |
| Median | 5.3% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.6% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to British by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to British are Immigrants from Germany (3.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Belgian (3.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Canada (3.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from North America (3.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and Hawaiian (3.5%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Northern Europeans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Slovenes | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Portuguese | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Hawaiians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Immigrants | North America | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 3.5% |
| British | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Belgians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |