Immigrants from Bolivia vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bolivia
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Bolivia
Chickasaw
2.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bolivia vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,707,824 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151 and weighted average of 2.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 75.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bolivia | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.24% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 5.8% | 21.2% |
| Range | 5.6% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 2.5% | 7.4% |
| Median | 2.4% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.79% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.88% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.87% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bolivia by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Thai (2.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Dominican (2.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Ghanaian (2.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (2.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (2.6%, a difference of 0.61%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Barbadians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Dominicans | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Thais | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Ghanaians | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 99.7 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.7 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |