Greek vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Greek
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Greeks
Chickasaw
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
3.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Greek vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,523,980 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Greeks and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 38.4%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Greek | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 21.2% |
| Range | 49.0% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 7.4% |
| Median | 4.0% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.6% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Greeks by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Luxembourger (3.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Ukrainian (3.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Maltese (3.2%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Portugal (3.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and Estonian (3.3%, a difference of 0.65%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Greeks | 3.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Estonians | 2.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Central American Indians | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Serbians | 2.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |