Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Chickasaw
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
64.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,807,709 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.409 and weighted average of 3.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 51.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.1% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 18.9% | 21.2% |
Range | 17.8% | 18.8% |
Mean | 4.3% | 7.4% |
Median | 3.2% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Cambodia (3.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Central America (3.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (3.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Japan (2.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 3.0% |
Arabs | 57.6 /100 | #169 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 56.9 /100 | #170 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 56.6 /100 | #171 | Average 3.0% |
Armenians | 56.0 /100 | #172 | Average 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |