Immigrants from Latvia vs New Zealander Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
New Zealander
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
New Zealanders
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
12.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
6.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs New Zealander Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,736,493 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.673 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,920,080 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.349 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 1.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | New Zealander |
Minimum | 0.16% | 0.53% |
Maximum | 17.1% | 14.1% |
Range | 17.0% | 13.6% |
Mean | 4.1% | 4.3% |
Median | 3.6% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 5.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia and New Zealanders by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Hungary (3.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Cape Verdean (3.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Romanian (3.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Pakistani (3.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and Hispanic or Latino (3.1%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Oceania (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |