Immigrants from Sudan vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sudan
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Sudan
Chickasaw
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
87.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sudan vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,954,451 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.120 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 56.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sudan | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.0% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 8.5% | 21.2% |
Range | 7.5% | 18.8% |
Mean | 3.0% | 7.4% |
Median | 2.8% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sudan by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Immigrants from Albania (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Zaire (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Bahamian (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), South American Indian (2.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (2.9%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |