Navajo vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison
COMPARE
Navajo
Immigrants from Oceania
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Navajo
Immigrants from Oceania
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Navajo Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 173,853,363 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.480. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to an increase of 11.7 Immigrants from Oceania.
Navajo vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $45,220, a difference of 55.8%), median household income ($59,159 compared to $89,100, a difference of 50.6%), and median family income ($70,989 compared to $106,453, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 14.7%), median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $40,297, a difference of 21.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $53,680, a difference of 26.7%).
Income Metric | Navajo | Immigrants from Oceania |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $29,031 | Excellent $45,220 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $70,989 | Excellent $106,453 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $59,159 | Exceptional $89,100 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,999 | Excellent $47,617 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,098 | Good $55,712 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,046 | Good $40,297 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $42,380 | Exceptional $53,680 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $66,529 | Excellent $97,623 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $69,759 | Excellent $103,705 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $47,722 | Exceptional $64,416 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.4% | Average 25.6% |
Navajo vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 136.0%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 115.2%), and single male poverty (25.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 104.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 40.2%), single female poverty (31.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 53.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 53.5%).
Poverty Metric | Navajo | Immigrants from Oceania |
Poverty | Tragic 23.1% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Tragic 18.8% | Good 8.7% |
Males | Tragic 22.3% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 23.9% | Average 13.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 30.3% | Excellent 19.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 23.3% | Average 13.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 31.6% | Good 16.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 30.2% | Good 15.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 30.3% | Good 16.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 30.5% | Good 16.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 31.7% | Good 20.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 29.2% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 40.2% | Good 28.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.9% | Good 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 17.5% | Excellent 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.4% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.1% | Good 11.4% |
Navajo vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 95.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 95.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 91.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 33.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 34.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Navajo | Immigrants from Oceania |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.4% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 9.8% | Average 5.3% |
Females | Tragic 7.3% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 18.6% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 29.0% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 10.6% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 9.3% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.7% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Poor 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.5% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Navajo vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 17.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (73.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 13.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Navajo | Immigrants from Oceania |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 56.6% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.2% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 32.1% | Exceptional 37.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 64.8% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.6% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 73.8% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 73.8% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 82.1% |
Navajo vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 68.4%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 40.8%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.59%), family households (66.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 4.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Navajo | Immigrants from Oceania |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.9% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 40.1% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.65 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.8% | Average 6.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 39.0% | Average 46.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Good 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Excellent 30.6% |
Navajo vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.47%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Navajo | Immigrants from Oceania |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Excellent 9.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.8% | Excellent 90.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.3% | Exceptional 57.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.3% | Exceptional 21.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Navajo vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 59.0%), bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 58.2%), and master's degree (9.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 55.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and 5th grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
Education Level Metric | Navajo | Immigrants from Oceania |
No Schooling Completed | Fair 2.1% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Poor 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Poor 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.2% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Poor 95.8% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Poor 94.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.0% | Fair 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.1% | Fair 90.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.2% | Fair 88.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.5% | Fair 85.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.3% | Average 65.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.8% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 32.6% | Fair 45.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.6% | Fair 37.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.4% | Fair 14.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Good 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Good 1.9% |
Navajo vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 45.6%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 44.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.0%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.8%).
Disability Metric | Navajo | Immigrants from Oceania |
Disability | Tragic 14.3% | Fair 11.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Fair 11.4% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.5% | Fair 11.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 33.3% | Poor 24.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 58.3% | Tragic 48.0% |
Vision | Tragic 3.1% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.6% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.5% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Fair 2.5% |