Zimbabwean vs Ethiopian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Ethiopian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Ethiopians
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,266
SOCIAL INDEX
70.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
126th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ethiopian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,547,871 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.118. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.095% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 94.9 Ethiopians.
Zimbabwean vs Ethiopian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 20.5%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $43,243, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $53,818, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $56,243, a difference of 0.10%), median household income ($90,618 compared to $89,640, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $64,989, a difference of 1.3%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Ethiopian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Exceptional $46,569 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Exceptional $108,251 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Exceptional $89,640 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Exceptional $49,572 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Excellent $56,243 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Exceptional $43,243 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Exceptional $53,818 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Good $96,824 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Excellent $103,736 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Exceptional $64,989 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Exceptional 21.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Ethiopian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.1%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.80%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and single female poverty (19.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Ethiopian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Average 12.2% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Good 13.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Excellent 16.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Average 16.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Average 16.5% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 11.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Zimbabwean vs Ethiopian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Ethiopian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Fair 17.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.3% |
Zimbabwean vs Ethiopian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Ethiopian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Exceptional 69.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Exceptional 82.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 38.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Exceptional 86.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Exceptional 86.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Exceptional 84.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Ethiopian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (47.4% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 9.7%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Ethiopian |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Tragic 61.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 43.2% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 44.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Average 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Ethiopian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 13.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Ethiopian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Average 10.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Tragic 53.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Tragic 17.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Ethiopian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 40.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.70%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Ethiopian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 95.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Poor 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Fair 89.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Good 86.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Exceptional 62.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Exceptional 42.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Exceptional 18.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Zimbabwean vs Ethiopian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.020%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.59%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Ethiopian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Excellent 22.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Excellent 46.8% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.2% |