Chippewa vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,584,998 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Crow within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.266. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 21.2 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Crow communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 31.0%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $31,729, a difference of 15.4%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $76,605, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $47,012, a difference of 0.010%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $35,266, a difference of 0.75%), and median earnings ($40,287 compared to $38,707, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Crow communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 75.7%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 61.0%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 9.4%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and single female poverty (26.8% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 211.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 205.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 152.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 13.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Crow communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.20 compared to 3.82, a difference of 19.5%), single father households (3.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (42.1% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (62.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Crow communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.1%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and associate's degree (40.7% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.030%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and 10th grade (95.0% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Crow communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 51.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 31.9%), and female disability (14.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.52%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.4%).