Chippewa vs Paraguayan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Paraguayan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Paraguayans
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,568
SOCIAL INDEX
73.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
112th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Paraguayan Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,434,352 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Paraguayans within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.613. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Paraguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 11.2 Paraguayans.
Chippewa vs Paraguayan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $50,385, a difference of 37.6%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $95,737, a difference of 35.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $106,615, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 3.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $55,614, a difference of 18.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $64,443, a difference of 19.7%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Paraguayan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Exceptional $50,385 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Exceptional $114,016 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Exceptional $95,737 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Exceptional $51,068 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Exceptional $59,975 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Exceptional $43,173 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Exceptional $55,614 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Exceptional $106,615 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Exceptional $109,447 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Exceptional $64,443 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Average 25.8% |
Chippewa vs Paraguayan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 56.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 50.4%), and male poverty (14.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 42.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Paraguayan |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 12.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 27.2% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Poor 11.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Poor 12.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Chippewa vs Paraguayan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 90.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 50.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Paraguayan |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Fair 11.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Tragic 19.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Good 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Chippewa vs Paraguayan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 29.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 3.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Paraguayan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Exceptional 66.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Exceptional 80.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Tragic 33.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Exceptional 83.5% |
Chippewa vs Paraguayan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.6%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 43.7%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.11%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Paraguayan |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Good 47.0% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Good 47.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Exceptional 29.7% |
Chippewa vs Paraguayan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 53.3%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 51.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 30.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Paraguayan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 14.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Tragic 85.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Tragic 50.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 16.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Chippewa vs Paraguayan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 69.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 64.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.0%), high school diploma (89.7% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.62%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Paraguayan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Fair 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Fair 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Fair 97.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Fair 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Fair 96.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Fair 95.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Fair 95.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Fair 94.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Average 93.7% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Good 92.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Good 89.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 67.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Exceptional 62.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Exceptional 51.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 44.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 18.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Chippewa vs Paraguayan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 52.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 51.1%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.1%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 7.7%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Paraguayan |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 2.0% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Exceptional 20.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 45.0% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |